Natural Healing Treatments
You are an Experiment of One and the only one that mattersTM
 
     
   
     
 

Archive for July, 2009

Midwife required, M.D. optional–German law

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Giving birth in Germany is like entering an altered universe. Imagine having a midwife counsel you through the months of pregnancy, guide you in making decisions before the birth in case of emergency, deliver the baby,  then make home visits daily as long as necessary.

Healthier Outcomes with Midwives

Midwifery in the U.S. has been so hounded by state legislators (who were besieged by AMA lobbyists) and eventually banned in many states so that we don’t even know what this health practitioner does. And we should know.  All the research shows that births conducted by midwives have a more positive outcome for maternal and infant health, physical and emotional, than do MD-directed, in-hospital births.  Other nations’ healthcare policy-makers know this.

In Germany, where I have been for the past few weeks, the law requires a midwife to attend to every mom and to deliver the babies. Having an M.D. present in the delivery room is optional, though some hospitals have them stop by “to witness” the birth.

Training of Midwives

Women training to be midwives have three years’ of classes and residency in a university hospital. The training focuses on gynecology and obstetrics, and they’re paid for their training. The German professional midwives association, with about 18,000 members, is organized by the 15 states or provinces.  The majority of midwives work in hospitals and are paid similarly to nurses, and about 80 percent of moms only work with midwives after the birth.

My niece is one of the 20 percent of German moms who chose to work with an independent, consultant midwife (not associated with a hospital) who counsels the mom (and dad) throughout the pregnancy and through the first year of the newborn’s life.  And private insurors pay 100 percent of the costs.

“You have so many questions, and the doctor has no time.  Most important to me was the midwife’s emotional support. The doctor can do much of the other (exams, etc), but not the emotional support,” Danya said.  Having her first child at 42, she was considered medically high-risk only due to her age. Knowing that, the midwife discussed with Danya and her husband contingency plans in case of complications. There were none, but having made the decisions in advance created a more relaxed delivery environment.

With phone consultations with the midwife being usual, Danya called her when contractions started.  The  move to the hospital was put off for several hours because home is a more comfortable environment, emotionally and physically.  She had used a homeopathic remedy to facilitate an easier delivery, and she checked into the hospital two hours before the birth.

Midwives’ services

Massaging the abdomen to realign organs displaced by the fetus? Only a midwife provides such care.  Danya’s midwife, a mom of a 2-yo herself, made home visits twice daily after Mom and baby returned home (2-day hospital stay). She gave instructions in breast feeding, showed Dad how to give the newborn a bath, answered questions of all manner of emotional and physical issues.

When his two-week (paid) paternity leave ended and her husband returned to his job, and Danya was having a tearful day, the midwife assured her this was the usual helplessness all moms felt on this day.  After the first week the midwife’s visits were daily for about another week. When the baby wasn’t gaining enough weight, she directed the new parents to add formula to his diet and to pump breast milk so that the amount he ate could be measured.

After the first month a scheduled visit to the home is made every three months. Wearing only a shirt, baby is put into a small, white sheet with straps that is hung onto a hand-held scale (picture the stork’s delivery sack). Reflexes are tested. Any other concerns of Mom are discussed. Periodic visits to the pediatrician are made, but the midwife will be called first about a rash.

The best health care brings into the practitioners’ arena all manner of health modalities that focus on wellness. And these practitioners–midwives, chiropractors, herbalists, body treatments such as Bowen and shiatsu, nutrition counselors–will  improve the health of Americans AND lower costs.

Other German friends were complaining that insurance wasn’t paying 100 percent of a three-week spa stay for an elderly woman who was the sole caregiver for her husband suffering from alzheimer’s. Insurance was paying for a one-month stay (perhaps longer) for him in a nursing home, and giving the caregiver/wife a health treatment at the spa in the nearby mountains.  I just shook my head in disbelief that they were disgruntled with this care, which is unheard of in the U.S.

This is wellness for all, and it’s the expectation of the Germans and the French.

Salud!

Beverly A. Jensen, Ph.D.

President, http://www.WomensMedicineBowl.com

(more…)

Public health insurance–Republicans don’t know they’ve got it right!

Friday, July 3rd, 2009


With one in six Americans without any health insurance and costs so astronomical that millions more are underinsured and with medical costs the largest cause of bankruptcy, still the Republicans are trying to scare Americans from supporting a government-supported health insurance option. Either Republicans are living on a different planet than the rest of us or they’re indebted to insurance companies for campaign contributions. Well, this is a no-brainer.

Please, Takeover health care!
Here’s the language they’re spreading all over the media, and it actually works for us (the public).

TAKEOVER! It’s a takeover! Now usually that term has the adjective “hostile” in front of it. It’s presumed to be an unwelcome takeover. In the case of government TAKEOVER of health care, BRING IT ON! The employment-based, market system clearly has not worked.

The AMA has fought against a universal health program in the USA for over 100 years, and with health coverage always based on employment, the nation’s retirees were left medically destitute until the establishment of Medicare with Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s. That medical program literally pulled our nation’s seniors out of the gutter and provided health care.

Rationing? Any would help millions
RATIONING! That usually means receiving less than you’re accustomed to. With nearly 50 million without ANY health coverage we need rationing. BRING IT ON!

Government oversight is needed in many areas of health care. According to a former editor of JAMA, 80 percent of lab tests are unnecessary and only serve to enrich the MDs who are shareholders of the labs.

The shortage of primary care physicians and millions without insurance has brought out shysters in the medical profession. One young female MD in Alexandria, VA, advertises $60 for an office visit then my daughter listened to her demand the patients’ credit cards for lab tests costing $1000, $1200, etc.

Laura had a lingering cold after a visit to Germany last winter, and the young MD exclaimed, “Oh, there’s a virus going around in Germany. We need to do a lab test.” Laura looked at her as if she were crazy (she was actually unscrupulous, greedy, and unethical), and said, “No, we don’t.” But very few consumers are educated enough to question their doctors’ judgments.

Bureaucrats–with a new purpose
BUREAUCRATS! Government bureaucrats will be in charge of making decisions on what medical care we receive. Who do they think is making those decisions now? The decisions are being made by thousands of bureaucrats (aka administrators) on the payrolls of the health insurance companies. And the objective at the insurance office is to find a reason to deny coverage or payment. (This is documented–I’m not making this up.) BRING ON THE (GOVERNMENT) BUREAUCRATS! The government bureaucrat’s objective will be PROVIDE, not DENY, health coverage.

A consumer-owned coop has been tried
One alternative plan that’s being floated by Sen. Ken Conrad (ND-Dem) is a non-profit consumer-owned cooperative. That’s the model that Blue Cross-Blue Shield was built upon (for teachers) some decades ago. Then the Blues turned for-profit in states that allowed them to and began the same practices of every other health insurance company which has dropped to nation’s health quality to 37th in the world according to the World Health Organization.

The USA isn’t even measured anymore among the world’s 19 developed nations, and we’re two notches above Cuba (39th) where, you can bet, the per capita cost is nowhere near $5,000 + in America, and no bankruptcies have occurred in Cuba due to health costs.

President Obama had the best response to the uproar the insurance companies are making (and their Republican lackeys) over the public insurance option. He told the NY Times, “If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality health care, if they tell us they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government—which they say can’t run anything—suddenly is going to drive them out of business? That’s not logical.”

A public health insurance option is necessary not only to save America’s health but it will go a long way in rescuing our spirit and our economy.

Salud!
Beverly A. Jensen, Ph.D.
President, www.WomensMedicineBowl.com

 
 
  Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact  
  WomensMedicineBowl.com is an independently owned company incorporated in the State of Nevada.
Copyright, Womens Medicine Bowl, Inc., 2003-2009