The Scientific Method
You are an Experiment of One and the only one that mattersTM
 
     
   
     
 

Archive for October, 2009

Our nutrition deficit–and why we gain weight

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

It was when the banana  liquified inside its skin and oozed a pale slime out onto the fruit basket that I decided it was time to look for organic vegetables and fruits.  But this banana had traveled from Central America to Dubai where I was living. Standards for what is “organic” aren’t consistently defined in the U.S.–forget about it internationally!

Giving up bananas was my only option, and I always selected produce that had traveled the shortest distances, vegetables and fruits from Jordan, Syria, and Iran were preferable to U.S., European or Australian imports. (This is a desert nation where virtually all food is imported.) The conditions of the soils and use of chemicals in growing food in other nations was unknown, but in the “processed” department the foreign operations were far superior to American. Fruit juice contained–vola! the fruit–only! No high fructose corn syrup to sweeten it up and fatten us up.

High fructose corn syrup–everywhere!

Barbara Kingsolver writes in Animal,Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life that the average American daily diet has an extra 700 calories through the addition of high fructose corn syrup into many processed food products.  Is it any wonder that the whole nation has pudged up with the dominance of prepared and processed foods on our plates?

We easily understand the relation between nutrient content of the vegetables and fruits and the soils they’re grown in, but it takes another mental leap to realize that the nutrient content of the animal products we eat is determined by what the chickens and cows are fed and their living conditions!  A chicken that’s spent its entire life in a cage has stress hormones that effect the eggs it lays and the meat we roast.

This isn’t the place for a treatise on soils, but I recommend the book Secrets of the Soil by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird . The updated edition in 1998 reports the alarming statistics on the use chemical fertilizers worldwide. In the 1930s, a University of Missouri soil scientist said, “The wealth of a nation is determined by its top six inches of soil.”  This is an eternal truth, for the soil grows the nation’s food, which determines our health.  An unhealthy nation doesn’t prosper–we have plenty of examples worldwide.

Before chemical fertilizers were manufactured (beginning in the 1950s) the soil on family farms was tended and supported by rotating crops and using the livestock manure. It was the natural cycle of  decomposition, renewal, and life. Now with huge corporate farms growing single crops (70 percent of U.S. farmland is in corn and soy beans–as Kingsolver says, “we’re one pathogen away from famine”) and heavy use of synthetic fertilizers the soil can’t support the life of organisms in the soil. The result is nutrient-poor soil.

Nutrients of 1950s produce and today’s 

Donald R. Davis, Ph.D., at the Biochemical Institute of University of Texas-Austin, compared the data of nutrients in vegetables and fruits collected by the USDA in 1950 and again in 1999.  Six out of 13 nutrients had declined, and seven showed no significant reliable change. As reported in a 2005 issue of Food Technology, the minerals phosphorus, iron and calcium declined between 9-16 percent. Protein was down 6%, riboflavin 38%, and ascorbic acid down 15%.

What does this mean to you and me? Well, you’d have to eat half a dozen peaches today to gain the nutrient content of ONE 1950 peach! Revitalizing the soils is the only solution, and family run farms are trying to do this. Growing evidence links organic production with higher levels of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants.  A study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (2007) reported a 10-year study comparing organic tomatoes with conventional tomatoes. As organic matter accumulated in the plots, the nutrients in the organic produce rose to 79% higher levels of quercetin and 97% higher level of kaempferol, on average, above the conventionally grown crop.

The eggs in my refrigerator now are from hens raised without hormones and free-range (no cages), fed grains with no animal by-products. Their shells are thin, irregular in shape and color, but they have 25% less cholesterol than caged fowl, and they taste better!  Organic milk misses the traces of 200 antibiotics found in ordinary milk.  Even M.D.s are advising that if you buy only one item ORGANIC, make it milk. Meat and milk from pasture-raised, grass-fed animals cotain greater levels of beneificial fatty acids including omega-3, alpha-linolenic acid, and conjugated linoleic acid. The animals live better, and so do we!

Salud!

Beverly A. Jensen, Ph.D.

President, www.WomensMedicineBowl.com

Do you really want a flu shot? Doctors decline

Saturday, October 3rd, 2009

Doctors often neglect to tell us patients the full scoop on our medical problem or  the potential consequences of taking a particular drug.  Sometimes they’re honestly clueless–in areas such as nutrition or methods of healing other than drugs–but sometimes they know info on a “recommended treatment” that leads them to decide THEY’RE NOT TAKING THIS MED, even if they’re pushing it on their patients.

This is the case with this season’s H1N1 flu vaccine. The government’s alarms this year–since March–bolstered by the irresponsible media frenzy was brought on by the World Health Organization very early declaring this hybrid flu strain a pandemic.  No such pandemic is happening, and several reports now indicate that this seasonal flu will be not much different than other seasons’.  Reports of 36,000 deaths “from flu” in an ordinary flu season are misleading; all but less than 2,000 of that number are attributed to pneumonia, an opportunistic infection caused by the flu virus.

Facts about the flu vaccine

Each season’s flu vaccine is a re-mix of previous years’ formulas. This year’s strain is somewhat different in that it’s a genetic mix of swine, avian, and human flu, a hybrid never seen in nature and suspected of having been developed in a lab. (The lab that announced a vaccine for this hybrid the same week that the flu was “discovered” in Mexico.)  

Because the influenza virus mutates through the season and in varying locales, the vaccine–every year–is credited with being effective only about one-quarter of the time.  The elderly, usually a prime target for vaccination campaigns, haven’t  benefited statistically. While the number of elderly vaccinated has climbed steadily during the past quarter of a century, their flu-related death rate has held steady (Archives of  Internal Medicine, Feb. 14, 2005)  Now, in fairness, a government agency disputed this study’s method, but their statistics weren’t any better–just get your shot anyway, they advised!

Poisons in that Flu shot

The vaccine contains chicken embryo injected with live flu viral strains. Then it has to be treated: formaldehyde is added to kill the viruses, thimerosal (a mercury derivative banned in every other vaccine but flu) is the preservative, aluminum is added to promote antibody response, ethylene glycol (bought as antifreeze for your auto) and phenol are disinfectants in the formula. And these poisons are suppose to keep you well!  While the season’s virus will keep mutating through the months so that the vaccine can’t provide viral protection, these toxins will surely make you ill!

Government has Vaccine stocks to Push

Maybe due to the WHO predicting a pandemic, and governments’ financing stockpiles of drugs for the event, state and local governments have ordered their health care professionals to take the flu shot or  be fired. Only about half of health care professionals routinely get annual flu shots, but when they’re being threatened with the shots, the positions of the professionals become known.  And they’re balking–they’re not going to get this shot.

Half of Hong Kong’s health care workers said they would refuse the H1N1 vaccine due to doubts about its efficacy and concerns about side-effects. The same reasons the rest of us should have! Physicians in England are declining to be vaccinated.  With New York city and state ordering health care professionals to be vaccinated or be fired, union reactions should be expected.

With the panic to produce enough vaccine, safety trials are truncated, and neither will drug companies be held liable for injuries or deaths due to the vaccine. However, in this age of the Internet and much more public discussion of all issues, the US government is also revving up a “defense databank” to counter claims of the (expected) side-effects of the vaccine.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is racing to compile a list of the usual numbers of health events: 25,000 heart attacks weekly, 14-19,000 miscarriages weekly, etc. In another government-sponsored project, the Harvard Medical School is linking large insurance databases that cover up to 50 million people; the project will check whether people who’ve had the vaccine go to a doctor in the weeks after a flu shot and why.  At Johns Hopkins University the Institute for Vaccine Safety will direct emails to at least 100,000 vaccinated individuals to track how they’re feeling, including complaints that may not lead to a doctor’s visit.

Perhaps the Internet–and the new media’s very public discussions- have driven the government’s new-found concern for public safety as we launch a new season of vaccine experimentation.  There is even a campaign to Wash Your Hands frequently, a public health message that is elementary, effective for disease prevention, not profitable for any company, and rare in government health campaigns. 

 Strong Immunity is only good defense

Instead of vaccination, the emphasis for the individual’s and public’s health in face of flu season should be stregthening one’s immunity.  The most elementary rules for supporting  your immunity to ward off disease are what your mother always told you: get plenty of sleep; eat sensible balanced meals (we have to add REAL FOODS, not packaged or processed foods or drinks); and exercise regularly.  Since our foods don’t the nutrient value they did years ago, nutritional supplements are necessary to boost immunity; vitamins C & E (d-alpha, NOT dl-alpha, a synthetic), beta-carotene. The herb echinacea and isatis root (Ban Lan Gen) bolster the immune system tremendously.

Ban Lan Gen, a Chinese herbal tea, Young Living’s Oil of Thieves, and Pflueger’s Immuno-Support product (in the WMB Shop) are my family’s favorites. Whenever I’m in a crowd, and especially on airplanes, I’m sniffing Oil of Thieves. Ban Lan Gen is great for adjusting to seasonal weather changes, and Pflueger’s Immuno-Support puts an end to on-going struggle with sniffles and every other lingering ailment.

During the flu season, the each member of the family has her own vial of Influenzium 30c and takes a dose once a month for flu prevention, and another dose/s if flu symptoms occur. Another homeopathic flu medicine that works miracles is Boiron’s Oscillicoccinum, knocking off a flu attack in less than 24 hours.

Strengthen your immunity and use herbs and homeopathy to stay well through this autumn and flu season. It’s a safer  route than a flu shot.

Salud!

Beverly A. Jensen, Ph.D.

President, www.WomensMedicineBowl.com

 
 
  Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact  
  WomensMedicineBowl.com is an independently owned company incorporated in the State of Nevada.
Copyright, Womens Medicine Bowl, Inc., 2003-2009